[geeks] Foundry vs. LocalDirector

[Mike Ekholm]

several million of hits a day to our website, and localdirector
has been fine.

We are moving to Cisco Content Switches now, so better
cotomize the enviroment tho.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 07:59:34PM -0400, Don Woodward wrote:
> Cisco LocalDirector is the way to go.
> 
> Don Woodward
> dbwoodw at abraxis.com
> sales at sunsunsun.net
> www.sunsunsun.net
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Bradford" <mrbill at mrbill.net>
> To: <geeks at mrbill.net>; <rescu3e at mrbill.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:30 PM
> Subject: [geeks] Foundry vs. LocalDirector
> 
> 
> Pros/Cons (other than the "LD is just a PC" argument).
> I need loadbalancing/failover between two web servers,
> and failover between load balancers if possible...
> 
> Bill
> 
> -- 
> Bill Bradford
> mrbill at mrbill.net
> Austin, TX
> _______________________________________________
> GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEEKS:  http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/geeks

 -Mike Ekholm

-- 
UNIX Sys Admin | ekholm at ekholm.org | http://www.ekholm.org | IRC: Nalez
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "It's hard to find people in society who can administer UNIX
     and professionally carry a weapon."
       - Jim Williams, former FBI Computer Intrusion Squad agent