[geeks] Clerks and Cars
Kurt Huhn
geeks at sunhelp.org
Sat Jul 28 08:35:12 CDT 2001
>
> What year taurus? I found out the other day that when a 2001 Taurus rear
> ends an 87 Jetta, the Taurus is the bit loser. The other car had
> significantly more damage than my little Jetta did.
>
*DISCLAIMER*
The below is a recount of a true story - do not try this at home! The
activities were highly illegal - and just a little stupid. They were *not*
performed by a professional driver (just a very experienced one) or on a
closed course (6am, on El Camino Real in Menlo Park, CA).
'95 GL w/ wide body trim. It's had its share of scrapes wit other cars -
some on purpose, some quite by accident (not my fault). I rear-ended a
Jetta with my Taurus once - she was playing the "you're angry because I cut
you off, so I'm going to go as slow as I possibly can" game. When she hit
10MPH, and I was sure her car wasn't broken (bcause she would weave when I
tried to pass her), I hit her. Not hard at first, just a light tap in her
bumper to let her know I was angry (those who watch stock car racing know
what I'm talking about). When she didn't let up I hit her at about 7MPH,
then nailed the gas - pushed her right the eff outta my way. Built up
enough momentum to send her into a empty parking lot (sideways) with a light
twist of the wheel. The whole incident covered less than 50yds.
I had a few scratches on the front bumper (easily buffed out) - I didn't
stop to look at her car...
The '95 was the last of the "fat body" Tauruses. I don't care for the
96-99 (and 2000?) models - except for the '98 SHO, which looks much
different with all the body trim and V8 emblems on it. I'd like to grab one
of those, but have a feeling my '95 will end up getting a SHO engine, and a
mild supercharger. The 2001 models are in improvement on the 96-99s, but
they're not as good looking as the 92-95s.
Kurt
More information about the geeks
mailing list