[geeks] Home Network (Was: Wireless Ethernet)
Sammy Ominsky
geeks at sunhelp.org
Thu Nov 8 08:08:20 CST 2001
Ken Hansen wrote:
> No, you should have tied a thread to the phone cord, pulled it down,
> attached the Cat5 *and* phone cord, and pulled it back! Heck, could even add
> a string to the bundle and leave it in place for the next "upgrade"...
Heh. Does the phone line running on the unused pair have much effect on
data transmission? I can't tell if it does. I ran the same thing to the
addition on the side of the house that didn't have a phone line.
I'm actually considering replacing all the voice lines in the house with
similar combined voice/data over cat5. Apparently there was some sort of
business int he house before, and the phone lines are all 25-pair cat3,
running from two central boxes on opposite sides of the house. It's all
very well done, but if I want data ports in the kids' rooms, I'll have
to replace it.
My plan is something like this:
(based on what I started doing already)
voice_______________|central box|
| | | |
| | | | (voice lines)
| | | |
DSL_________________|patch panel|______|modem|____|firewall|__|AUI
MAU|__(DMZ)
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | (data lines) |
| | | | |switch|
| | | |______________________||||||||_
\ \ \________________________/// \\\\_
\ \_________________________// \\\_ (rest of
network)
\__________________________/ \\_
\_
Then from the patch panel, I would run combined lines up to the various
rooms. Is this a bad idea for any reason? I know that optimally, the
voice and data should be seperate, but this isn't a multi-billion$$$
corporate office, and my wife/kids' web surfing isn't mission critical.
---sambo
More information about the geeks
mailing list