[geeks] (long rant on many things)

[Joshua D Boyd]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:20:26AM -0400, s at avoidant.org wrote:
> Joshua D Boyd wrote:
> 
> > Underwear is less rough than denim?  Seems like a good reason for me.
> 
> 
> No it's not. The reason for underwear, from what I've heard, was that
> once upon a time, when people bathed far less frequently than they do
> now, it was important to maintain a layer of something between your body
> and your clothes (which were laundered far less frequently that they are
> now).
> 
> ----------------------
> WARNING: Do not read the following if you fear TOO MUCH INFORMATION
> shock.
> 
> Personally, I don't own any underwear, and don't plan to buy any in the
> forseeable future. I bathe regularly and launder my clothes.
> ----------------------

Personally, I think I'd find my jeans uncomfterble without underwear.  My 
warn up pants and sweats might be different though...

-- 
Joshua D. Boyd