[geeks] Web Browsers that Don't Suck
Jonathan C. Patschke
jp at celestrion.net
Fri Apr 12 14:54:01 CDT 2002
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Joshua D Boyd wrote:
> Have you looked at amaya? It is from the w3c. Some say it is fast. Haven't
Dowloading it now.
> tried it myself. Also, have you tried galleon on irix?
That requires GNOME, which requires approximately half of the source code
available on the world-wide-web. Galleon is nice, but GNOME is quite
evil.
> I suspect your best results would come from either fixing KDE or figuring out
I started that. I tried. Really hard. The problem lies in that G++
suffers from the same register-alignment problems as the rest of GCC under
IRIX. And MIPSpro C++'s std isn't too std (String, for instance, is
broken. Augh!). The end result would be a code-fork for MIPSpro/IRIX
(since I doubt the changes could be integrated nicely), or waiting for the
GCC group to fix that long-standing bug.
> how to optimize Mozilla rather than actually starting from scratch. Someone
> really needs to attack mozilla with a profiler and identify what the darn
> problem is.
Mozilla, perfectly optimized, would still be Mozilla. It would still have
a JavaShit UI, and who knows how much other extraneous crap. I want a web
browser, not Emacs reimplmented in JavaScript.
So, my -best- results would come from writing my own, probably against
Motif or GTK (assuing I find the secret to making GTK apps that don't
crawl). It just wouldn't be the path of least resistance.
--Jonathan
More information about the geeks
mailing list