[geeks] Re: geeks digest, Vol 1 #2172 - 20 msgs

[Dave McGuire]

On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:17 PM, dave at cca.org wrote:
>>   Was there some suggestion that tempest *isn't* real?  Shit, I have
>> tempest-certified gear here that I got when I was in my teens.
>
> No, no, just the effectiveness of non-nuke EMP devices.
>
> People like to talk about them, but what's actually been
> *demonstrated* hasn't been too impressive so far.
>
> Remote *surveillance* is incredibly effective & sophisticated.
> No doubt about that.

   Uhh, yeah...tempest has more to do with RFI/EMI sniffing than EMP 
protection.

       -Dave

--
Dave McGuire                 "You don't have Vaseline in Canada?"
St. Petersburg, FL                     -Bill Bradford