[geeks] An NFS conundrum (solved)

Phil Stracchino phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
Mon Feb 19 17:26:07 CST 2007


Sandwich Maker wrote:
> " From: Phil Stracchino <phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net>
> " I've now changed all my nfs mounts from rsize=8192,wsize=8192,soft to
> " rsize=16384,wsize=16384,hard,intr,tcp,nfsvers=3 and it's all working
> " now.  After a little more experimentation I may try going to nfsvers=4.
> 
> rsize=1024,wsize=1024 would be a good experiment, as packets that size
> shouldn't be messed with.  i had to do that once, many moons ago, for
> a transcontinental nfs mount.  it wasn't my idea.

Yeah, it'd avoid any question of packet assembly issues.


-- 
 It's not the years, it's the mileage.
 Phil Stracchino              phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
 Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker, Free Stater
 Landline: 603-429-0220                Mobile: 603-320-5438



More information about the geeks mailing list