[geeks] An NFS conundrum (solved)
Phil Stracchino
phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
Mon Feb 19 17:26:07 CST 2007
Sandwich Maker wrote:
> " From: Phil Stracchino <phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net>
> " I've now changed all my nfs mounts from rsize=8192,wsize=8192,soft to
> " rsize=16384,wsize=16384,hard,intr,tcp,nfsvers=3 and it's all working
> " now. After a little more experimentation I may try going to nfsvers=4.
>
> rsize=1024,wsize=1024 would be a good experiment, as packets that size
> shouldn't be messed with. i had to do that once, many moons ago, for
> a transcontinental nfs mount. it wasn't my idea.
Yeah, it'd avoid any question of packet assembly issues.
--
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
Phil Stracchino phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker, Free Stater
Landline: 603-429-0220 Mobile: 603-320-5438
More information about the geeks
mailing list