[geeks] Second Life is not a game?
Sridhar Ayengar
ploopster at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 14:14:41 CDT 2007
Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>> In World of Warcraft (for example), Blizzard strongly, actively and
>> determinedly discourages the sale of WoW items or gold for real cash
>> money, because it messes with the virtual economy in the game when
>> players can just go buy 50,000 gold. They terminate accounts on mere
>> SUSPICION of it. I know someone who had his account terminated for
>> loaning his girlfriend 800 gold for an epic mount. You yourself
>> acknowledge that the "money" you make in EVE Online isn't real.
>>
>> Second Life people make REAL SPENDABLE INCOMES that they can live on.
>
> People make real income playing all kinds of games, not just the ugly and
> complicated game called Second Life. There are persistent game worlds
> where people use it as their only source of income.
>
> SL is a game. I can't understand why the fact that is has some extra rules
> on top of it, and its interface sucks, somehow makes it less of a game.
>
> Call it a simulation if it sounds better for some reason.
I'd be more inclined to think that SL is "reality" if had sex with a
woman, she could get pregnant and have your kid. That's a pretty big
line to cross for a "virtual environment".
Peace... Sridhar
More information about the geeks
mailing list