[geeks] Global warming, was Mr Bill?
Phil Stracchino
alaric at metrocast.net
Tue Sep 23 17:47:22 CDT 2008
der Mouse wrote:
>>>> [...] high-level radioactive waste [...]
>>> For what value of "safe"?
>> If all else fails, we could always pitch'em at the Moon. Be a bit
>> expensive though.
>
> I think the Sun would probably be better. We're a lot more likely to
> want to put humans on the Moon than we are on the Sun. (And if we ever
> do want to put humans on/in the Sun, the technology necessary to do it
> at all will probably be advanced enough that radioactivity would be at
> most a minor nuisaance, especially given how tiny the contribution we
> could make would be; the Sun is _big_.)
True. Then again, if we start putting people on the Moon, we may want
those fissionables.
> But, honestly, I think it would be better to just stockpile them
> against the day when it becomes economic to extract the energy
> contained in them. We're pretty close already.
Honestly, so would I. Frankly, we can use most of them *right now*.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric at caerllewys.net alaric at metrocast.net phil at co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
More information about the geeks
mailing list