[geeks] Impressive...
Mark Benson
md.benson at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 12:55:19 CST 2009
On 5 Mar 2009, at 17:29, Lionel Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Sridhar Ayengar
> <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> nate at portents.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You can fit five 3.5" drives in three 5.25" bays, or 4.5TB.
>>>
>>> This is what I get for not drinking my coffee before emailing -
>>> five 1.5TB
>>> drives would be 7.5TB, not 4.5TB. So data density is actually
>>> higher with
>>> 3.5" drives, but my point about RAID flexibility stands with 2.5"
>>> drives.
>>
>> But I would also bet that twelve 2.5" drives would use more power
>> than five
>> 3.5" drives.
>
> Good lord, have we been reduced to worrying about power
> consumption?! ;^)
Power consumption and living comfort are important factors for me. I
figure 4 3.5" drives is not going to be a huge problem if done right,
after all my Mac Pro runs 4 and it's pretty quite. One major thing
that I found with 3.5" drives is they are a lot quieter if you use
them in cradles floated on rubber bushes - you don't get that nasty
Beats interference if you have more than 1 7200rpm drive :)
Power consumption is something I'd like to keep reasonable. Maybe
under 200W at idle if at all possible?
--
Mark Benson
My Blog:
<http://markbenson.org/blog>
Visit my Homepage: <http://homepage.mac.com/markbenson>
"Never send a human to do a machine's job..."
More information about the geeks
mailing list