[geeks] KVM for Sun Sparc Servers with USB keyboards

[Lionel Peterson]

On May 8, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Shannon Hendrix <shannon at widomaker.com>  
wrote:

> On May 7, 2009, at 11:58 , Sandwich Maker wrote:
>
>> ...so of course the correct move would be to raise the amt threshold
>> until it again targeted only the extremely wealthy - but also of
>> course, the wealthy and their political puppets will be careful to
>> steer the debate well away from any suggestion of that sort...
>
> You could also stop taxing the wealthy at insane tax rates, so they  
> have less incentive to avoid the tax, and you probably would make  
> more money in the long run because they could spend more on private  
> enterprise.

Lower tax rates lead to greater tax revenues - I think we proved that  
in the eighties, then we quickly forgot that lesson.

>
> Well, assuming you also uncrippled private enterprise at the same  
> time.

What like supporting deregulation? See the nineteen eighties...

>
> It's also enlightening to see what a lot of political monkeys think  
> is "wealthy".

What does a politician making $165K/yr think is rich? Anyone that  
makes over $250K/yr. Oddly, making less than $250K/yr supposedly make  
you middle-class (at best), yet the AMT kicks in at a much lower  
income level.

Oh, and earning three times your state poverty level or less qualifies  
you as low income (for CHIP benefits).

Lionel