[geeks] Audio Recording
Dan Sikorski
me at dansikorski.com
Tue Jan 25 21:45:04 CST 2011
On 1/25/2011 9:38 AM, gsm at mendelson.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:18:02AM -0500, Dan Sikorski wrote:
>> I'm assuming that the live performances mentioned in the original
>> post are music, and not spoken word or anything else. I would go for
>> a lossless codec (FLAC) regardless of how good you think they sound now.
>
> This makes no sense to me at all. If you use audacity or another similar
> program it's going to keep the samples as uncompressed data. Back in the
> days that a CD was bigger than any hard drive you could buy, it made
> sense to compress the data to store it.
>
I guess i misstated what i really meant. Either store uncompressed or
use a lossless compression. Or more simply stated: Don't go though a
bunch of effort to rip from analog, then store it in a lossy format.
> This puts about 8-9 hours of raw samples on a DVD-5 and you can do the
> math for a cheap USB external drive. So compressing them with FLAC,
> which takes a lot of CPU time and only saves about 50% of space does not
> seem to be a big bargain to me.
>
> If you need to convert FLAC to a useable format, e.g. MP3 or AAC, you
> need to uncompress it (again at a heavy CPU price) before you recompress
> it. Then you need some sort of program to re-create the tag information
> from the FLAC file to the MP3 file. IMHO a big waste of time.
>
To me, FLAC is a very usable format. I have both software on my
computers as well as portable media players that use it. Unfortunately,
while my home theater receiver does FLAC playback, it has a hard time
with 24 bit FLAC. And by hard time, i mean, there's a bunch of static
and little music.
> So my suggestion is to keep the raw files as they are, and save them to
> backup media. Convert them to whatever your player plays and you are
> happy with and use them. In a year that player will not be that good
> anyway, and in five, you'll want to go back to the original files and
> recompress them with whatever sounds better and your player takes.
I think we're in agreement one one thing: If you don't want to go back
to the tapes, rip and store in the highest quality that you can stand to
deal with.
-Dan Sikorski
More information about the geeks
mailing list