[geeks] Replacing a Mac Pro 2006
Ben Greisler
ben at kadimac.com
Sun Dec 2 17:35:32 CST 2012
On Dec 2, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Shannon wrote:
> Yeah, have to agree there. I'm not even sure it would hurt them or kill the
> Mac Pro either. There is room for something.
Apple announced there would be something else that we should see mid-2013 from
what I understand.
>
> Another thing they need to do is get off the stupid super-thin design rut.
I
> don't WANT stuff to get thinner. Its already uncomfortably thin, and
severely
> limits capabilities and grossly increases maintenance issues.
Most people really don't care what is inside the machine and broken machines
aren't a huge problem percentage-wise. And now that Apple includes two 10Gbs
Thunderbolt connections on the iMacs, allows up to 32GB RAM and both SSD and
spinning rust disks, there is a pretty good choice of options. Thunderbolt
allows the connection of anything from a 10GBs HBA to fibre channel to
anything else that is PCie.
>
> The iMacs the reason I can't use one is they are incredibly difficult to
work
> on, and in their quest to make them excessively thin, they dropped features
Curious, what did they drop from the iMacs that can't be added back in again
via TB?
Ben Greisler | Owner / Technical Lead | Kadimac Corp
ofc: 215-821-1440 | email: ben at kadimac.com
Certified Member - Apple Consultants Network - ACSA | Xsan | ACT
Apple Professional Services Provider - Education and Enterprise
More information about the geeks
mailing list