[geeks] fax from Solaris and/or Linux?
Mouse
mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG
Mon Dec 16 14:37:59 CST 2013
> Fax over IP is really ugly. There are two protocols: T.37 and T.38.
> One is store-and-forward, the other is real-time. Both are really
> poorly supported.
There exist ATAs that support T.38, in the sense that they speak the
usual POTS fax protocol (T.4/T.30, I think?) over their PTOS port and
then speak T.38 over SIP out the other side.
> Don't try to fax over a VOIP line.
That matches my own experience, but see below.
> VOIP codecs are designed to compress all of your fax data out of the
> signal. It's very unreliable.
This is a problem with codec choice, not a problem with VoI[%]. One of
my employers does VoI telephony and usually uses G.711, which is
basically "no compression". (It does mu-law range compression, but no
inter-sample compression.) I once did some tests; I found that
conventional faxing works fine with traditional fax machines over
SIP/RTP with an ATA speaking G.711, _provided_ there is no packet loss.
With packet loss, even as little as a single packet, it usually falls
over rather hard (about the best case I saw is losing a few mm of
scanlines). The usual fax codecs are designed to deal with the errors
POTS typically introduces, which are very different from the errors VoI
typically introduces - that's why T.38 exists (it's designed for the
sorts of errors IP telephony typically introduces).
[%] VoIP has been used for a lot longer than most people realize, just
not in ways visible to the end user. What's new is doing VoIP over
the open Internet; it really should be called VoI, Voice over
Internet.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
More information about the geeks
mailing list