[rescue] OT: Solaris for Intel

[joshua d boyd]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 11:45:36AM -0500, Bill Bradford wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:37:09PM -0400, joshua d boyd wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 11:56:26AM -0400, sambo at charm.net wrote:
> > > Bill Bradford wrote:
> > > > I have to say, Win2K *is* the best Windows yet.. My box at work here never
> > > > reboots/locks up unless I reboot it on purpose..
> <snip>
> > Err, they would be as similarly crash-resistant as NT and 95 are.
> 
> NT/2K is DEFINITELY more crash-resistant than 95/ME.
> 
> I dont see datacenters (or Telcos, like the one I work at) running
> applications on top of Win95. 8-)

I was trying to make an analogy.  IE:

95 is to NT as:
ME is to 2000
Linux is to Dos
camero is to mustang
OSX is to OS9

You know, like from the SATs.  The part that you snipped is the statement
that I was addressing where someone mumbled something about expecting ME
to be able the same as 2K.

-- 
Joshua D. Boyd