[rescue] Blades in the dark
Bill Bradford
rescue at sunhelp.org
Fri Nov 23 23:15:20 CST 2001
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:52:05PM -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Yes, it was that bad. The original design was FULL of stupid
> limitations that prove the designers never had any sort of growth in
> mind for the platform. Witness the A20 barrier, the ridiculous
> I-can-only-boot-from-C:-or-A: stupidity, the unbelievably stupid video
> subsystem design, etc. And don't even get me started on the CGA in
> particular, with its big fuzzy nowhere-near-square pixels and
> video memory mapped right smack in the middle of the low address
> space. *grumble*
> It's a terrible design that should never have made it out of the
> playroom of the idiots who put it together.
I read an article recently that said the basic motherboard design, etc,
was "lifted" from the Datamaster, their failed precursor. A LOT of the
original PC design was re-used stuff.
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
Austin, TX
More information about the rescue
mailing list