[rescue] 7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]7. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for thedisks?]

[Bill Bradford]

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:30:29PM -0500, Leslie Connally wrote:
> someone PLEASE shorten this SUBJ Line!!!!!  AAAHHH !!!
> makes for a VERY messy digest TOC
>   11. Re: RE: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        the disks?] (Bill Bradford)
>   12. Re: Re: 224 mhz sparc 20? (Joshua D Boyd)
>   13. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        thedisks?] (Dave McGuire)
>   14. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        thedisks?] (Dave McGuire)
>   15. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        thedisks?] (Joshua D Boyd)
>   16. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        thedisks?] (Scott Newell)
>   17. Re: Must have peripherals [was Re: worth it for
>        thedisks?] (Joshua D Boyd)

Quit reading email on your Commodore 64. 8-)

Bill

-- 
bill bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
austin, texas