[rescue] Long network paths

[Joshua D Boyd]

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 06:07:22AM +0000, Kris Kirby wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > > Dude, go FDDI, it's much better (doesn't collapse under saturation > 45%)
> >
> >   Absolutely.  And that 4470-byte MTU makes things very tasty for things
> > like cache hits from your local Squid box.
> 
> Now if I could find some FDDI PCI cards and a FDDI blade for my Lanplex
> 2500....

You didn't get an FDDI blade with it?  I was begining to think that
was standard since I've never seen one without it.  I know mine has
the FDDI blade.  Finding the 100TX blade was a major pain though.

-- 
Joshua D. Boyd