[rescue] SS10/20 death

[dave at cca.org]

mcguire at neurotica.com writes:

>On February 5, dave at cca.org wrote:
>> >And Suns are fine machines, even if you have one that might "suck" compared
>> >to modern machines.. but, like you've said, just because a machine is no longer
>> >sold or isnt the fastest one, doesent mean it quits working or functioning.
>> 
>> I wouldn't say a nice but old machine "sucks" in any way. Simply being
>> slower than some alternatives doesn't qualify as "sucks" to me.

>  Wow, what a coincidence...me either.

>  The issue isn't just that the SM100 is slower, Dave.  It's a crappy
>design from top to bottom.  The architecture (SPARC) is good, but the
>implementation is terrible.

Oh, I lost the context of that thread, I didn't realize he was talking
about your comments about the SM100. Never mind. :-)

------ David Fischer ------- dave at cca.org ------- http://www.cca.org ------
---------------------- "It's something to do." Cerebus --------------------