[rescue] Re: SM[567]1/HyperSPARC comparison (was RE:[rescue] SS10/20death)

[s at avoidant.org]

Brian Hechinger wrote:

> the SX is probably one of the slowest framebuffers you can get in a sparc.


That would 'splain it then. Only two ways to fix that, though, and they
both require two of those Fujitsu cards, and at least one other
"upgrade". I could really use an expansion box card and cable, but
they're few and far between.

Would anyone trade dual 100MHz Hypers for dual SM51s? quads?


> oh, and the answer to your question sambo, it's 384M total.


Yeah, if I'd stopped to do the math, Id've known that. But I'm lazy.


---sambo