[rescue] threaded or linear reading? (appropriate subjects)
Brent B. Powers
powers at b2pi.com
Mon Feb 18 09:52:52 CST 2002
>>>>> "George" == George Adkins <george at webbastard.org> writes:
George> On Monday 18 February 2002 04:18 am, you wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Derrick D. Daugherty wrote: > > 3-4 days
>> ago. You really need toread the threads. > > i never read that
>> post since the subject was prolly off > and i wasn't following
>> that thread.
>>
>> How many people read this list in a threaded way? I read it
>> linearly in Pine, and I don't know how I would manage to read
>> it all, if it was displayed threaded?
>>
>> What do other people do?
>>
George> Threaded, definitely. K-Mail. (On Solaris) I wouldn't be
George> able to keep track of the conversations and replies if it
George> weren't threaded.
People use non-threaded mua's? VM under xemacs. I've been told that
there's an OS under xemacs, but I've never seen a proof :)
More information about the rescue
mailing list