[rescue] threaded or linear reading? (appropriate subjects)

Brent B. Powers powers at b2pi.com
Mon Feb 18 09:52:52 CST 2002


>>>>> "George" == George Adkins <george at webbastard.org> writes:

    George> On Monday 18 February 2002 04:18 am, you wrote:
    >> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Derrick D. Daugherty wrote: > > 3-4 days
    >> ago. You really need toread the threads.  > > i never read that
    >> post since the subject was prolly off > and i wasn't following
    >> that thread.
    >> 
    >> How many people read this list in a threaded way?  I read it
    >> linearly in Pine, and I don't know how I would manage to read
    >> it all, if it was displayed threaded?
    >> 
    >> What do other people do?
    >> 
    George> Threaded, definitely.  K-Mail. (On Solaris) I wouldn't be
    George> able to keep track of the conversations and replies if it
    George> weren't threaded.

People use non-threaded mua's? VM under xemacs. I've been told that
there's an OS under xemacs, but I've never seen a proof :)



More information about the rescue mailing list