[rescue] Another Reason Windows Sucks
ssandau at bath.tmac.com
ssandau at bath.tmac.com
Tue Jul 9 08:00:40 CDT 2002
I would *run* from Windows X-PeePee as fast as possible. My limited
experience suggests it's the ultimate in
I'm-smarter-than-you-are-and-I'm-out-to-prove-it software, and follows
in the eat-up-all-the-system-resources Windows tradition. And don't get
me started on sound cards...
I'd go back to win2k if you have to have windows. Even then you have to
deal with a fsked-up network configuration and "My Network Places." I
really hate using software written for 5-year-old users. At least in
windows terms it is relatively stable.
(Personally, my one Windoze box at home has 95, and my
need-it-to-sign-in-and-out Windows box at work is NT.)
Eric Dittman wrote:
>
> When I upgraded my Inspiron 8000 to a Latitude C810 my WinXP
> everything seemed to be okay for a couple of days, then so
> may problems came up that I was forced to do a fresh install,
> whict still didn't help. I finally ran the diagnostics and
> found out that a sector on the hard disk was bad.
>
> A special format with options to lock out bad sectors was
> required.
>
> Why the hell didn't a complete format map out bad sectors,
> and why doesn't WinXP have any kind of error checking on
> reads and writes?
>
> Why? Because it sucks, that's why.
>
> If I didn't have to have Windows loaded on the laptop I'd
> load something else.
> --
> Eric Dittman
> dittman at dittman.net
> Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
--
Steve Sandau, IS Technician
ssandau at bath.tmac.com
TMA Bath Maine
More information about the rescue
mailing list