[rescue] Recommended patches for old versions (why)

[Kevin Loch]

"Loomis, Rip" wrote:
> 
> I definitely wouldn't describe 2.6 as "rock solid", but beauty
> is in the eye of the beholder.
> 

Maybe the initial release, but with current (or even early) patches
it was definately rock solid.  I ran it for years on my main
workstation and I still have a few in production with 3rd
party software that required it.

KL