[rescue] ECC [was: Re: WOT: Ebay changes to IBM from Sun E10Kservers?]
Charles Shannon Hendrix
shannon at widomaker.com
Sat Jul 12 12:54:14 CDT 2003
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:13:24AM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Properly-implemented ECC is the right thing to do. Yes, it's more
> expensive, but it's the right thing to do. A memory error that would
> otherwise bring a system to its knees will simply cause an entry into
> an error log with ECC...turning unexpected downtime into scheduled
> downtime.
Not only that, but if all systems just assumed quality in the first
place, the prices would be cheaper. Slightly more than the junk, but a
lot less than current high-quality hardware.
Saving money by buying cheap systems is a false savings.
> With this "I like my stuff to work all the time" attitude, am I just
> being too intolerant?
Nope... the world has just accepted too much crap, and it makes people
like us look to be the odd man out.
--
UNIX/Perl/C/Pizza____________________s h a n n o n at wido !SPAM maker.com
More information about the rescue
mailing list