[rescue] OS/2 anyone?

vance at neurotica.com vance at neurotica.com
Tue Jun 17 18:17:14 CDT 2003


Actually, as OS/2 went from 2.0 -> 2.1 -> 3.0 -> 4.0 it got faster, rather
than slower.

Peace...  Sridhar

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. wrote:

> Is the PS/2 model 51 a 386 or a 286 (like the PS/2 model 50).
>
> I believe OS/2 needs a 386 or higher...  (I'd also imagine
> OS/2 version 3 would be pretty slow on a 386).
>
> -- Curt
>
> >Subject: Re: [rescue] OS/2 anyone?
> >From: Stefan Skoglund <stetson at ebox.tninet.se>
> >To: The Rescue List <rescue at sunhelp.org>
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >Date: 08 Jun 2003 02:11:33 +0200
> >
> >fre 2003-06-06 klockan 18.10 skrev N.Miller:
> >> Digging through the hills (used to be mountains) of
> >> computer stuff here at the house, I found a copy of
> >> OS/2 v.3.  It's never been used.  The box has
> >> everything in it, just has had the shrink wrap
> >> removed.
> >
> >Is it floppies ???
> >If so it should be a snap for me to install it on my PS/2 51.
> >I don't have a cdrom enclosure :-(
> >_______________________________________________
> >rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
>
>
> Curtis Wilbar
> Hawk Mountain Networks
> rescue at hawkmountain.net
>
> My e-mail is protected against viruses and spam by MailGuardian
>                   http://www.mailguardian.net
>           Top notch protection at unbelievable prices
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue



More information about the rescue mailing list