[rescue] Re: G5 case

[Bill Bradford]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:05:26PM -0400, Mike Johnson wrote:
> Shouldn't have.  Based on those stats alone, it should have been fine.
> This wasn't a pre 1.0 version, was it?  With the size network you're
> talking about, it should have been loaded, but not keeling over.  Unless
> you specified some huge (>500 hosts) discovery range.

This was less than 25 hosts being monitored.

> I imagine you don't care anymore at this point, though.  

Yeah, exactly.  OpenNMS wasn't exactly user friendly.

Bill

-- 
bill bradford
mrbill at mrbill.net
austin, texas