[rescue] Elite3D Question

[Francois Dion]

I've been playing with IOZone ( http://www.iozone.org/ ) and it helps in 
tuning systems, beside comparing filesystems and hardware. Certain 
kernel and FS settings and raid layouts have much more impact than the 
type of FS. Also been playing with Solaris 9 x86 UFS logging, software 
mirroring and it beats hardware mirroring (on the same mobo), 
interestingly enough. Much greater diff than UFS (sol 9)  vs XFS (linux) 
on the same box.

Francois

Phil Stracchino wrote:

>On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:53:56PM -0500, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>  
>
>>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 @ 22:38 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I've been giving very serious thought to moving to either xfs or jfs
>>>myself.  Right now, I'm using ext3.
>>>      
>>>
>>JFS is supposed to have gotten a big speed boost recently, and someone
>>told me it outran XFS in some recent tests.
>>    
>>
>
>I saw some filesystem benchmarks recently, in some of which JFS edged
>out XFS, while in others XFS edged out JFS.  Both soundly beat ext3 for
>most operations.
>
>A friend of mine swears by ReiserFS, but it didn't perform that
>dramatically better than ext3 on the benchmarks, and any filesystem
>which consumes 70% of CPU for the filesystem ALONE on some operations is
>not something I want anything to do with using.