[rescue] Filesystem choice for fileserver?
Meelis Roos
mroos at linux.ee
Thu Apr 17 07:41:45 CDT 2008
> XFS really excells with large files. Here you'll find its performance
> to be way faster than ext3 and maybe even faster than reiserfs.
Yes, http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/seekwatcher/ext3_vs_btrfs_vs_xfs.png
is a recent visual indication that comes to mind.
I mostly prefer ext3 because it has never really failed me (only once
when I forced a fsck on a mounted FS - got about 2% of files back). XFS
is my filesystem of choice when large files and/or parallel streaming
reads-writes are used. One gotcha is default yournal size (or metadata
buffer size ir RAM) - default used to be smallish and this resulted in
relatively slow metadata operations (like deleting a huge source tree).
There's a mount option to increase the RAM buffer size, or maybe
creatinga bugger journal during mkfs also helps.
--
Meelis Roos (mroos at linux.ee)
More information about the rescue
mailing list