[rescue] [OT] S: IBM /370 or /390 card
Joshua Boyd
jdboyd at jdboyd.net
Tue Sep 12 17:45:02 EDT 2023
On 9/12/23 16:37, Dave McGuire via rescue wrote:
> On 9/12/23 16:25, Mouse via rescue wrote:
>>>> Wasn't the XT/370 primarily made with 68000s with custom microcode?
>>>> [...] I'd love to see someone work out how to redo that on a newly
>>>> made board.
>>> Since the 68K's control store is in mask ROM on the chip, I think
>>> that would be a challenge.
>>
>> I can't imagine that there would be any difficulty beyond possible lack
>> of documentation in reimplementing a 68k with writable microcode in a
>> modern FPGA.
>
> How I interpreted Josh's question was the modification of a 68K's
> microcode.
I was originally thinking modify the microcode in the chip, but making a
cycle accurate microcode compatible 68K in an FPGA to run altered
microcode would also be cool. Extra cool if the FPGA's image was
derived from a scan of the 68k silicon. Square the cool if that was
then run through on one of Google's Open MPW shuttles.
I haven't dug into it too deeply, but I think that when people talk
about emulating 68000s as part of, say, the MiSTer project, they are
using a fairly high level emulation of 68000s, not something that is
executing original microcode. I guess it would be interesting to know
what is really happening there. Also how far down the accuracy hole the
MAME 68k core goes.
More information about the rescue
mailing list