[SPARCbook] Re: Overclocking 3GS
E. Keith Howick, Jr.
keith.howick at siliconmetrics.com
Fri Dec 17 13:44:49 CST 1999
Actually, no more juice is needed. Overclocking a CPU is an issue of internal parasitic capacitance and MOS breakdown voltages as the
temperature goes up. If the process happened to keep the capacitance down and the breakdown voltage high for that chip, you can get
away with overclocking (to an extent). What increases the temperature is the increase in the clock frequency (more "high-voltage" time
per second).
I've overclocked PCs, some work, some don't. You will bring the reliability (i.e., lifespan) of the CPU down and the older the CPU when
you overclock the faster it dies. Personally, I don't overclock anything that's expensive or hard to replace.
-Keith
Jeff wrote:
> As far as I know, the more volts you put in a processor, the hotter it gets. My friends and I have over clocked a good number of
> machines (only x86 I don't screw with my Suns), and it never seems to work right. The damn thig always gets hot, the OS will freeze
> and I would guess that it's hard on the cpu too. It's been my experience that say, (I'm not sure about exact specs) a Pentium 400
> will run 3.2 volts and same with a 450, but for you to get the 400's clock cycles up to 450 you gotta give it more juice.. So what
> I'm getting at, and I could be wrong, even though they're both Microsparcs and the only difference is clock speed, it will always be
> harder and hotter to get the most performance.
> Just my two cents.
>
> Jeff
>
> C:\ is the root of all problems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sparcbook mailing list - Sparcbook at sunhelp.org
> http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/sparcbook
More information about the SPARCBook
mailing list