[SunHELP] filesystem question
Foust, Kal E
sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Wed May 2 12:15:34 CDT 2001
I don't know if things have changed regarding filesystems to the point that
these entries are no longer relevant. My understanding is that "lost+found"
'directories' are created automatically when you build the filesystem. They
are used by <fsck> in emergencies and so should not be deleted without
diligence. There purpose being that if <fsck> finds a file whose parent
directory is unknown, it puts the file into the "lost+found" directory at
the top level of the filesystem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Chase [mailto:echase at postoffice.providence.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:47 AM
To: sunhelp at sunhelp.org
Subject: Re: [SunHELP] filesystem question
It certainly doesn't appear to be...
The first character when doing an "ls" is a "d", not an "l".
At 08:27 AM 5/2/2001 +0100, Will Mc Donald wrote:
>Is #028482 a symlink? I have no idea what it is or why it's there but if it
>is a symlink you're *probably* safe to delete it.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Edward Chase" <echase at postoffice.providence.edu>
>To: <sunhelp at sunhelp.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:09 PM
>Subject: [SunHELP] filesystem question
>
>
> > I was just nosing around a machine and found the following...
> >
> > If I "cd /opt/lost+found"
> > I see a directory "#028482"
> > If I "cd #028482", I end up at "/"
> >
> > I've unmounted the /opt filesystem and fsck'd it. There are currently
no
> > errors.
> >
> > What's happening here?
> > Can I "cd /opt/lost+found" and "rmdir #028482" safely?
> > If "rmdir" doesn't work, should I "rm -rf #028482"?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Solaris 2.5.1, if it's of any importance...
---------------------------------------------------------------
Edward F. Chase III | echase at providence.edu
Providence College | http://www.providence.edu
Computer Services | http://studentweb.providence.edu
Providence, RI 02918 |
More information about the SunHELP
mailing list