[geeks] LCD display options
Phil Stracchino
phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
Wed Feb 23 20:47:22 CST 2005
Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>Planar PL2010M, 20" 1600x1200, excellent 600:1 contrast ratio but slow
>>25ms response time, HD15 and DVI-D, about $680
>
> If one could get their display to support 40hz output, and they weren't
> gamers, 25ms wouldn't be so bad. Alas I don't know that any cheap video
> card (meaning not some highly specialized card that originally had a
> over $1k pricetag) will allow that, but I may be wrong. And the silly
> display might not accept a sync rate that low anyway.
>
> The LCD will stay rock steady no matter how low the refresh rate is, so
> games aside, how high does it really need to be?
Right. For text use, that's really not going to matter much, and most
streaming video doesn't achieve 40fps anyway.
--
Phil Stracchino
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
phil.stracchino at speakeasy.net
phil.stracchino at ceva-dsp.com
Mobile: 408-592-8081
More information about the geeks
mailing list