[geeks] to click on "unsubscribe" or not...?
Phil Stracchino
alaric at metrocast.net
Thu Jul 2 15:26:59 CDT 2009
Mike Meredith wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:25:04 -0400, hike wrote:
>> NEVER respond to SPAMMERS
>> you will only encourage them
>> (answering proves that your email address is "live"
>
> I don't think I did suggest responding. And responding to addresses in
> the message headers just isn't going to reach any spammer ... they're
> pretty much all forged.
>
> (There's a slimy bunch of critters who claim a "previous business
> relationship" (genuinely) that don't strictly qualify as spammers but
> are almost as irritating; they will have valid email addresses in the
> headers although the reply address is almost certainly a black hole)
And anyone who claims "This message is not spam because" and goes on to
cite, iirc, SB1618, *which never passed*, is a spammer ... it makes an
easy way to detect commercial spammers who are trying to pretend they're
not spammers.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric at caerllewys.net alaric at metrocast.net phil at co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
More information about the geeks
mailing list