SNMP BABY! (was: [rescue] IBM RS/6k 48P)

[Bjorn Ramqvist]

"Loomis, Rip" wrote:
> 
> > Well, from what I know that CPU module runs fine in an SS10... If you
> > have a barebone SS10 and want to try it, it's fine.
> 
> Umm.  Your definition of "runs fine" is different than mine.  Praytell,
> what operating system are you using that fully supports the SM100
> without having to sacrifice small animals in the light of the moon,
> and actually has acceptable performance?

I think performance must be out of this issue here, rather "power-on
test, see logo, machine works, power off".

> The SS10 in which I played with an SM100 didn't want to run any reasonable
> OS, and had performance which seemed lower than an SS1+.  Yes, it might
> be okay for certain tasks--but I wouldn't describe it as "runs fine".

The sounds odd to me actually. Last time I saw perf-specs on the SM100,
it's simply an SS2 per CPU, making it somewhat four SS2's on a module
(roughly).

/Bjorn