[rescue] New to me PDP-11/23+
Jerry Weiss
jsw at ieee.org
Mon Nov 7 04:11:17 EST 2022
Micro ODT will be expecting 22 bit addresses. Example: use 17773000.
77773000 works as well. Micro ODT will ignore the extra bits. Leading
0's are not required.
The halt suggests that the internal ROM is not being used and/or is
configured to go to an external ROM from a disk controller or other
device that isn't present.
What are the switch-pack settings?
Jerry
Micro ODT will be expecting 22 bit addresses. So use 17773000.
77773000 works as well (ODT will ignore the extra bits).
On 11/6/22 10:41 PM, John Hudak wrote:
> In one of the processor handbooks, I think it is called the
> microcomputer handbook, there is a chapter that tells you everything
> you need to know about using ODT. Have you read that? It is on bitsavers.
> Sorry I can’t be of more help, been at least 20+ years since I used
> ODT. Also I think DEC micronotes had some description of ODT features.
> I’ll slog through my library and see if I can find anything helpful
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 10:12 PM Steve Hatle <steve.hatle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK - so I now have a serial terminal hooked up to the 11/73, and
> when I power it up, I get the line
>
> 173000
>
> and then the "@" prompt, which I assume means I'm in ODT.
>
> >From what I can read, 173000 should be the address in the ROM to
> fire up the setup menu on the KDJ11-B board, but no matter what
> I'm entering at the prompt I either get back question marks or it
> seems to jump around to different memory addresses.
>
> so anything like
>
> @173000G
>
> or entering a "p" after the machine comes up don't get me anywhere.
>
> VT320 terminal is set to 9600 8N1, not sure if I need to do
> anything to differentiate between CR and LF as I'm entering things.
>
> So - can you tell this obvious noob what I'm missing to get any
> further on this guy?
>
>> Jim Carpenter <mailto:jim at deitygraveyard.com>
>> October 17, 2022 at 7:38 PM
>>
>> Sure. I have a Xyplex MaxServer that boots off a CF card and does LAT
>> and TCP/IP with no licenses needed. The user interface is just like a
>> DECserver, which makes sense as the people that founded Xyplex were
>> all DEC employees.
>>
>> Cisco terminal servers can also do LAT and TCP/IP.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rescue list - http://sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue_sunhelp.org
>> Peter Stokes <mailto:peter at ashlyn.co.uk>
>> October 17, 2022 at 8:22 AM
>> Hi
>>
>> You could use a TCP/IP terminal server instead with Unix? Some of
>> them did both LAT and TCP/IP from memory, though I may be mistaken.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rescue list - http://sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue_sunhelp.org
>> Dave McGuire <mailto:mcguire at neurotica.com>
>> October 17, 2022 at 7:48 AM
>> Those terminal servers are fantastic, but that approach would
>> require LAT on the PDP-11. That's possible, but not with any of
>> the UNIX implementations that Steve is considering.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list - http://sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue_sunhelp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rescue list -http://sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue_sunhelp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sunhelp.org/pipermail/rescue_sunhelp.org/attachments/20221107/56b4241a/attachment.html>
More information about the rescue
mailing list