[rescue] Old sci and ide drives

Joshua D. Boyd jdboyd at jdboyd.net
Mon Mar 13 12:18:14 EDT 2023



On March 13, 2023 11:50:03 AM EDT, Grant Taylor <rescue at gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>On 3/12/23 11:32 PM, Joshua D. Boyd via rescue wrote:
>> I'm starting on some reorganizing, and hopefully some reduction to make room for new items coming into my house. And something that is bugging me is this massive stockpile of old hard drives. I have IDE hard drives, sata hard drives, narrow scsi drives, wide scsi up to ultra 320, and some SAS.
>
>Can I ask that you quantify -- or at least how many digits are in -- the number of drives you are talking about?
>
>I think I'm in the low three digits myself.

In volume, it is about 40litres, and I'd like to get that down to 15l. I didn't count then add I was moving them. I'd guess maybe 50.

>
>> I'm trying to determine what I really want to keep. For instance, I can't think of any place where a small SATA HDD can't be replaced by a small SATA SSD in the future. Likewise I have to wonder if small IDE hard drives can always be replaced by small IDE to SATA SSD bridges, or IDE to CF bridges or IDE to SD cards bridges. I can't think of any instances of hearing about that not working. In the case of scuzzy, it seems there are so many scsi to SD adapter so that I'm wondering if there's any point in personally keeping narrow scsi devices anymore.
>
>I think that X to Y adapters are interesting.  But not all of them perform nearly the same.  CF is slow.  SD is a little bit faster.  SATA & NVMe drives are the fastest but use the most expensive X to Y adapters.

In terms of vintage HDs CF and SD don't have to be slow. I'm talking theory rather than available adapters though.

I believe ata to CF adapters with udma 220x CF cards should match or exceed most older IDE. Also, I'm less concerned about refunding ide stuff in the future than I am scsi.

That said, people say that Scsi2sd can do 10mbps, which matches fast narrow scsi. 

I'm not aware of any hobbyist targeted adapters doing fast-wide and faster. Thus, I'm sure I should be keeping some ultra wide drives, and some ultra 320 drives. I think ultra wide (not lvd) will work on any wide system. Please correct.me if im wrong. I'm also thinking keep a pair of sas and a pair of fcal, just in case I ever want for testing something.




More information about the rescue mailing list